Legal Opinion

Mosier v. Tinker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 20, 1926No. 16419PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

Plaintiff relies upon four propositions thus stated in her brief:

“First. The plaintiff had not been legally married, and she was not otherwise qualified to make a deed to real estate.
“Second. The plaintiff was unduly influenced.
“Third. The relation of the parties and the circumstances are such that the burden is on the defendant to show the fairness of the transaction, and this she has failed to do.
“Fourth. There was no consideration.”

As to the first proposition above stated, it may be disposed of by the mere statement that there was no allegation in plaintiff's petition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. FolsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Hughes v. KanoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Morgan v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Washington v. MortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vails v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Bergman v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API