State v. Burris

*337SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J.

¶ 82. (dissenting). The majority summarily and without analysis concludes that "the proceedings in this matter were neither arbitrary nor fundamentally unfair."1 conclude that the minimum due process requirement of notice was violated in the present case.

¶ 83. Furthermore, the majority upholds the circuit court's decision to revoke supervised release on the ground that revocation of supervised release is necessary for the safety of others. I conclude that the State failed to prove this ground for revocation by clear and convincing evidence.

¶ 84. Finally, I reach the…