Legal Opinion

Ranofsky v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Martin, J.:

The infant plaintiff, five years of age, resided with his parents orie flight above the ground floor in the defendant’s tenement house. It is alleged that on November 6, 1921, at about six p. m., he fell on the stairway leading to the ground floor and fractured the bones of his right thigh. He was permitted to make an unsworn statement to the jury, giving his version of the accident.

That such evidence is inadmissible was held in Stoppick v. Goldstein (174 App. Div. 306). In that case the court said: “ The trial court should have ascertained whether this plaintiff, nine years old at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stoppick v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. Michel v. SemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Neustadt v. New York City Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fineman v. KrebsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
  2. People v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API