Legal Opinion
Love v. Putnam
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1894No. 4831PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from the district court of Dodge county. Tried below before Post, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This is an action instituted in the district court of Dodge county by the defendant in error against plaintiff in error to recover damages for the alleged conversion of some hay by plaintiff in error which it is claimed by defendant in error belonged to him. The petition was in the words and figures following :
*87“ The plaintiff complains of the above named defendant and alleges that on the 8th day of August, 1887, one N. L. Hughes made and delivered his certain promissory note in writing to I. B. Hickok in words and figures following, to-wit:
“ ‘ $167. Fremont, Nebraska, August 8,1887.
“‘Sixty…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- City of Lincoln v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Northeastern Nebraska Railroad v. FrazierNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Buck v. Davenport Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Wiley v. SharsNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City National Bank v. Goodloe-McClelland Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Stein v. VanniceNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Lincoln Traction Co. v. BrookoverNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Schlecht v. HinrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Roderick v. WiensNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.