Brittingham v. Town of Georgetown
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VALIHURA, Justice:
In this appeal, we are asked to consider whether the Superior Court abused its discretion by declining to exercise its mandamus jurisdiction to remedy various alleged violations of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (“LEOBOR”). Petitioners-below Shawn Brittingham (“Brit-tingham”) and Christopher Story (“Story”) (collectively, the “Appellants”) sought mandamus relief for several alleged violations of LEOBOR while they were police officers with the Georgetown Police Department (“GPD”). Respondents-below Town of Georgetown (“Georgetown”), Georgetown Chief of Police…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clough v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Downen v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- State ex rel. Dussell v. Lakewood Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Henderson v. Mayor of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Abbott v. AaronsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
- Adams v. JenningsSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021
- Balsamo Real Estate, LLC v. Town of Fenwick IslandSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023
- Brandywood Civic Association v. CohanSuperior Court of Delaware · 2020
- Burris v. Superior CourtSuperior Court of Delaware · 2020
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.