Legal Opinion

Paul v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 3, 1965No. 64-940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal of a denial of a petition to vacate judgment and sentence.

Appellant was convicted on five counts of forgery. He was sentenced on each count, sentences to run concurrently. It is petitioner’s contention that his convictions were predicated upoh guilty pleas, which pleas were unlawfully induced.

The trial court conducted a full and evi-dentiary hearing at which petitioner was present and represented by counsel.- After taking testimony and hearing the arguments of counsel the trial court resentenced the petitioner due to some confusion in the record with regard to prior…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Russ v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Jack Wright Twining v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. PittsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  3. State v. TroehlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Wilson v. StateCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API