Legal Opinion

State v. Miles

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 2017No. 2016-CA-38PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTucker, J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Domoniq Miles asserts that the trial court, after electing to consider his motion, filed under R.C. 2951.041, for intervention in lieu of conviction (ILC), erred by overruling the motion without conducting the hearing required when a court considers an ILC motion. We conclude that the trial court did not consider the ILC motion. Accordingly, the court was not required to conduct a hearing before overruling the motion. The trial court's judgment is affirmed.

I. Facts

{¶ 2} Miles, on May 6, 2016, was indicted for Improperly Handling a Firearm in a Motor Vehicle, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MassienOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. RiceOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. BranchOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. StantonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CabannisOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. State v. MilesOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API