Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roubideaux v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 22, 1985No. F-83-701Published

1DissentParks, Presiding Judge

I must respectfully dissent. I am of the opinion that the evidence relating to the death of Nima Carter was improperly admitted. I would reverse and remand this case for a new trial, one in which evidence of this unrelated subsequent crime would be barred.

In holding that the trial court did not err in admitting circumstantial evidence of a similar crime committed one and one half years after the crime for which appellant was tried, the majority, in my opinion, extends 12 O.S.1981, § 2404(B) to impermissible limits. We have repeatedly, and consistently, held that there is... a well-established…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roulston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Jett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  3. Selfridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Oglesby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API