W.S. v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
In this appeal, we are asked to construe the provisions of law governing restitution in juvenile delinquency cases.
WS. was adjudicated a delinquent minor for assaulting a twelve-year-old boy. As explained in more detail below, the superior court ordered W.S. and his parents to pay restitution to the victim's aunt (who was the boy's guardian and physical custodian) and to a mental health counselor who provided counseling services to the victim following the offense. W.S. argues that, in a juvenile delinquency case, the superior court lacks the authority to order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Hitt v. J. B. Coghill, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. WentzAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Lonis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
- J.C.W. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- R.C., a minor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018
- State of Alaska v. Brennan Adam GrubbAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
- WS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008