Legal Opinion

Selzer Automotive, L.P. v. Cumberland Plastic Systems, LLC

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 6, 2010No. 1090068PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODALL, Justice.

Selzer Automotive, L.P. (“Selzer”), a foreign limited partnership whose parent company is a German corporation, appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration of its dispute with Cumberland Plastic Systems, LLC (“Cumberland”). We reverse and remand.

I. Procedural Background

On July 8, 2008, Cumberland and Selzer executed a contract whereby Selzer would purchase from Cumberland certain component parts for products to be manufactured by Selzer. The contract contained the following pertinent provisions relating to arbitration:

“17. Arbitration.
“In the event of any…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Walter Burnes v. Pemco AeroplexCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. BrunoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White Tiger Graphics, Inc. v. ClemonsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  2. Hillwood Office Ctr. Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  3. Hillwood Office Ctr. Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API