Legal Opinion

In Re Plemenik

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 5, 1945Published

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from an order of the Prerogative Court denying allowance of an order to show cause and dismissing a petition which prayed its allowance for want of jurisdiction. Henry Schott and Theresa, his wife, by petition to the Prerogative Court, sought to have annulled an order of the surrogate of Essex County, admitting to probate the codicil to the will of Lillian B. Plemenik. They charged that the codicil was the result of undue influence exercised by the proponent, Henry Pomerehne, a member of the bar, and ask that his letters of administration, said to have been procured by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re RomaineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1933
  2. In Re AllisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1930
  3. In re will of HodnettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1903
  4. In re the appeal from the decree of the orphans court of the county of Camden dismissing the appeal from the order of the surrogate setting aside the probate of the last will & testament of FrankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1921
  5. In re the estate of WhiteheadNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API