Legal Opinion

Scott v. Childers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Hill. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall.

1Opinion of the Court

TEMPLETOH, Associate Justice.

The appellee, W. H. Childers, was engaged in the dairy -business at Hillsboro. The dairy property consisted of about twenty acres of land and thirty cows with their calves. Childers had bought this property from G. H. Vaughan, and had given his notes, aggregating about $5000, for part of the purchase money. The notes were secured by a lien on the property. Vaughan owed W. S. Heard a note for $1044, and E. M. Cox and another were sureties on said note. The Childers notes were put up with Heard as collateral to further secure the note for $1044. Vaughan also owed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. HurleyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Schoolher, Bernstein & Co. v. HutchinsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Kohn Bros. v. Washer & AugustTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Muenster v. FieldsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. E. J. Hart & Co. v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Priddy v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. GrenigCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Scott v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Coker v. Cooper's EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Hernandez v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API