Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1988No. WD 40545PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

This appeal concerns the denial of motion for post-conviction relief. Wright appeals the decision of the motion court denying that: 1) his plea of guilty to two separate charges amounted to double jeopardy; and 2) trial counsel’s failure to inform his client of the possible double jeopardy implications of pleading guilty to the two crimes amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel.

The underlying facts are that Wright stole a controlled substance and entered guilty pleas, then in this case, on advice of counsel pled guilty, to charges of possession of the same contraband.

Wr…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Villa-PerezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. OrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Blaney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. Villa-PerezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API