In re Raquel M.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Andrias, J.P.
(dissenting). I would reverse, vacate the fact-finding and dispositional orders, and dismiss the delinquency petition.
Family Court erroneously applied the permissive presumption in Penal Law § 165.05 (1) (a person who rides in a vehicle without the consent of the owner is presumed to know that he or she does not have such consent) and, absent any direct or circumstantial evidence that appellant, a rear seat passenger, knew she was riding in a stolen vehicle, its finding that appellant was guilty of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree is against the weight of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. McCalebNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. RobyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. MoroNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- In re Antonio R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re Curtis H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.