Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Raquel M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 2002Published

1Dissent

Andrias, J.P.

(dissenting). I would reverse, vacate the fact-finding and dispositional orders, and dismiss the delinquency petition.

Family Court erroneously applied the permissive presumption in Penal Law § 165.05 (1) (a person who rides in a vehicle without the consent of the owner is presumed to know that he or she does not have such consent) and, absent any direct or circumstantial evidence that appellant, a rear seat passenger, knew she was riding in a stolen vehicle, its finding that appellant was guilty of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree is against the weight of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. McCalebNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. RobyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. MoroNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. In re Antonio R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. In re Curtis H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API