Weintraub v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Weintraub)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY THE UNITED STATES
KAREN S. JENNEMANN, Bankruptcy Judge.
In its motion for summary judgment and reply (Doc. Nos. 9 and 15), the United States argues that the debtor’s tax liability for the years 1992 and 1993 should be excepted from discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1)(B)® because the debt- or’s late filed Forms 1040 were not “returns” within the meaning of section 523. 1 In his response, the debtor, Bernard Abraham Weintraub, argues that his late filed Forms 1040 were “returns” within the meaning of section 523 and that his tax…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Beard v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1984
- Robert A. Spence, Margaret A. Spence v. Walter R. Zimmerman, Katherine B. Zimmerman, City of Clearwater, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- In Re William C. Hindenlang, Debtor. United States of America v. William C. HindenlangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- In Re: James H. Hatton Debtor. United States of America v. James H. HattonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. KleinDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004