Legal Opinion

Leggett v. Hyde

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1874Published

1Opinion of the CourtFolger, J.

At thé trial each party asked the court to direct a verdict in its favor. Each thereby conceded that there could be no dispute upon any question of fact; each thereby conceded that there was left for decision only a question of law, and that it arose upon a settled and uncontradicted state of facts.

Taking the view of the testimony the most favorable for the appellant, the facts are these: In 1869 one Putnam and Henneberger were partners in business, under the firm name. of A. D. Putnam & Co. In that year the appellant invested or deposited with that firm $1,500. This sum was credited, on its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burckle v. . EckhartNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  2. Manhattan Brass & Manufacturing Co. v. SearsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Chase v. BarrettNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  4. Catskill Bank v. Horace Gray & the Ulster Iron Co.New York Supreme Court · 1851
  5. The Ontario Bank v. . HennesseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API