Leggett v. Hyde
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFolger, J.
At thé trial each party asked the court to direct a verdict in its favor. Each thereby conceded that there could be no dispute upon any question of fact; each thereby conceded that there was left for decision only a question of law, and that it arose upon a settled and uncontradicted state of facts.
Taking the view of the testimony the most favorable for the appellant, the facts are these: In 1869 one Putnam and Henneberger were partners in business, under the firm name. of A. D. Putnam & Co. In that year the appellant invested or deposited with that firm $1,500. This sum was credited, on its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burckle v. . EckhartNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Manhattan Brass & Manufacturing Co. v. SearsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Chase v. BarrettNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Catskill Bank v. Horace Gray & the Ulster Iron Co.New York Supreme Court · 1851
- The Ontario Bank v. . HennesseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.