United States v. Alejandro Umana
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentGregory, Circuit Judge
The majority opinion denies Mr. Umaña the right to confront his accusers in a jury proceeding to determine whether he lives or dies. The right to confront one’s accusers is a right as old as it is important. Cf. Acts 25:16 (“[I]t is not the Roman custom to hand over anyone before they have faced their accusers ... ”). The Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant the right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him” “in all criminal prosecutions.” U.S. Const. amend. VI. It also guarantees the right to an attorney, jury factfinding, notice of the crimes of which a defendant is accused, and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.