Legal Opinion

Emery & Kaufman, Ltd. v. Heyl

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 23, 1955No. 41390Published

1Opinion of the Court

80 So.2d 95 (1954)

227 La. 616

EMERY & KAUFMAN, Ltd.,

v.

Add A. HEYL et al.

No. 41390.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 8, 1954.

On Rehearing March 21, 1955.

Dissenting Opinion March 23, 1955.

Rehearing Denied April 25, 1955.

Claude F. Kammer, New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.

Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, Robert E. Leake, Jr., New Orleans, for appellee.

MOISE, Justice.

The gravamen of this appeal presents the issue of the dischargeability or nondischargeability of a debt in bankruptcy. The judge of the district court held that the debt, under the circumstances of record, was non-dischargeable in…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Chapman v. Forsyth & LimerickSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. HerbstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  5. Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API