Legal Opinion

Kiernan v. Fritz

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.

Defendant moves to strike paragraph eighth of the amended complaint on the ground that the matter contained therein is indefinite, uncertain and obscure, and for other reasons set forth in the notice of motion. The amended complaint was served following a determination by another Justice of this court, who struck out certain paragraphs of the original complaint wherein plaintiff attempted to plead a certain contract of insurance which, as plaintiff claimed, enured to the benefit of the present defendant. Paragraph eighth of the amended complaint contains most of the infirmities of the matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wagman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Irwin v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Ramsey v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bonsignore v. L & D Carriers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API