Legal Opinion · Dissent

Richard Chapman v. State of Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2018No. 2016-CA-01655-SCTPublished

1Dissent

KITCHENS, PRESIDING JUSTICE, DISSENTING:

¶ 171. I respectfully dissent. Neither Chapman nor the State has raised the circuit court's grant of an out-of-time appeal as an issue. I would not disturb the circuit court's finding that Chapman is entitled to an out-of-time appeal. The same analysis the majority employs to reverse the circuit court's grant of an out-of-time appeal was considered and rejected by this Court in Chapman v. State , 167 So.3d 1170 (Miss. 2015) ( Chapman IV ). We held that Chapman's claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for neglecting to file an appeal was not time…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Newell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Richard Chapman v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Brawner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API