Legal Opinion

Selkirk Seed Co. v. Forney

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2000No. 24271, 24292PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

This is an appeal from an action in which appellant Selkirk Seed (Selkirk) sought a declaratory judgment stating that the Office of the Idaho Attorney General did not have authority to represent non-governmental insureds of the Idaho State Insurance Fund (SIF). Selkirk’s motion for summary judgment was granted in part and denied in part.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Facts

In 1995, the Idaho Legislature passed the Legal Services Unification Act, which restricted the use of private attorneys in representing state governmental entities. Section 67-1401 of the Idaho Code, as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Spencer v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Haman v. FoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Brady v. PlaceIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Idaho Health Facilities AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Van v. Portneuf Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bailey v. SanfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. McCann v. McCannIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. CDA Dairy Queen, Inc. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Barton v. Board of RegentsIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API