Legal Opinion

Fred's Department Store v. Paschal

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 22, 2005No. 2040099PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rosa Faye Paschal ("the customer") sued Fred's Department Store ("the store"), alleging that, as a result of the store's negligent or wanton failure to maintain its business premises in a safe condition, she was injured when she tripped and fell in an aisle of the store. The store answered, denying the customer's allegations and asserting the affirmative defenses of open-and-obvious hazard and contributory negligence.

The case was tried to a jury. The store moved for a judgment as a matter of law ("JML") at the close of the customer's case-in-chief and again at the close of all the evidence.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Quillen v. QuillenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Tice v. TiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Lamson & Sessions Bolt Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Denmark v. Mercantile Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Ex Parte Mountain Top Indoor Flea MarketSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cotten v. ST. BERNARD PREPARATORY SCHOOLCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  2. Cotten v. ST. BERNARD PREPARATORY SCHOOLCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  3. Fred's Department Store v. PaschalCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API