Fred's Department Store v. Paschal
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Rosa Faye Paschal ("the customer") sued Fred's Department Store ("the store"), alleging that, as a result of the store's negligent or wanton failure to maintain its business premises in a safe condition, she was injured when she tripped and fell in an aisle of the store. The store answered, denying the customer's allegations and asserting the affirmative defenses of open-and-obvious hazard and contributory negligence.
The case was tried to a jury. The store moved for a judgment as a matter of law ("JML") at the close of the customer's case-in-chief and again at the close of all the evidence.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Quillen v. QuillenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Tice v. TiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Lamson & Sessions Bolt Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Denmark v. Mercantile Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte Mountain Top Indoor Flea MarketSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cotten v. ST. BERNARD PREPARATORY SCHOOLCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Cotten v. ST. BERNARD PREPARATORY SCHOOLCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Fred's Department Store v. PaschalCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005