Legal Opinion

Administrators & Heirs of Frye v. County of Calhoun

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1852PublishedCited by 16 opinions

This cause was heard and decided by the Circuit Court, at the August term, 1852. The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of this court.

1Opinion of the CourtTreat, C. J.

This was a suit in chancery, instituted in the names of the county of Calhoun, Thomas Church, Henry T. Mudd, administrator of John Chancy, Yawlier, Hicks & Co., Cowles & Krum, and Hood & Abbott, as judgment creditors of John Shaw, against William Frye and John Shaw. The object of the suit was to set aside, as fraudulent, a mortgage of real estate, made by Shaw to Frye. At the return term, the suit was dismissed as to the complainants Church, and Hood & Abbott. Frye then entered a motion to dismiss the suit, and filed an affidavit in support thereof, in which he stated, that the suit was…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Town of Kankakee v. Kankakee & Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Bell v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Miller v. MetzgerIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Reed v. CurryIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Town of Big Grove v. Town of FoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API