Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 11, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Indictment for assault with intent to rape. Before Judge Sea-brook. . Effingham superior court. January 16, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

1. A charge in an indictment that the accused “did feloniously assault and attempt . . to ravish and carnally know ” the female alleged to have been assaulted necessarily implies that the act was done forcibly and against her will. Harman v. Com., 12 Serg. & Rawle (Pa.), 70; Davis v. State, 42 Tex. 228; Williams v. State, 1 Tex. App. 92; Gibson v. State, 17 Tex. App. 574; O’Connell v. State, 6 Minn. 190; 2 Wharton’s Am. Cr. Law, § 1154.

2. The ground of the motion for a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered evidence is without merit, it not appearing that the accused was before the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Folsom v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State v. PeytonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Beard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API