Legal Opinion
Bp Chemicals Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 31, 1994No. 93-1413PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
22 F.3d 1103
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
BP CHEMICALS LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 93-1413, 93-1414.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 7, 1994.
Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc
Declined…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Denis E. Dehne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- C. Sanchez and Son, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- William Eugene Owen, as of the Estate of Caroline Pearson Payne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Herman Chang, Patrick Conners, William Guthrie, Warren Parkhurst, John Register and John Woodward v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- North Ferry Co. v. Local 333, United Marine DivisionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004