Legal Opinion

Katz v. Arundel-Brooks Concrete Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 8, 1959No. [No. 254, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This appeal is from a judgment entered upon a directed verdict for the defendant, at the close of the plaintiff’s case, in an action for personal injuries sustained in the use of ready-mixed concrete. The facts are uncontradicted. The appellant, 35 years old, is the owner of a dwelling at 25 South Lloyd Street, in Baltimore City, although he resides at another address. He had worked as a mechanic for a pinball company, but was unemployed at the time of the injury. He was directed by the City Health Department to rat-proof and cement the dirt cellar, which was 20 feet by 30 feet in size, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Le Vonas v. Acme Paper Board Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. Irene Barker, Irene Barker v. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
  3. McClanahan v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  4. Otis Elevator Co. v. EmbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  5. Simmons v. Rhodes & Jamieson, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Pemberton v. American Distilled Spirits Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Moran v. Fabergé, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Myers v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Read Drug & Chemical Co. v. Colwill Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Twombley v. Fuller Brush Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API