Legal Opinion

Earl Earnest Scott v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 2, 1970No. 30115PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Scott’s motion to vacate sentence under Title 28, U.S.C., Section 2255, was given a three-day evidentiary hearing by the trial court, March 31, April 1 and 2, 1970. At the conclusion of the hearing after arguments of counsel, the district judge dictated extensive oral findings of fact and conclusions of law into the record, reserving the right to “polish or edit them in final form, perhaps placing this holding in a memorandum opinion should that seem suitable”.

A written memorandum was never filed, but we consider the oral findings and conclusions to be sufficiently complete to dispose…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ekberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  2. Henry Travis Schnautz, Jr. v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Natividad Baca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  4. Theodore Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
  5. Harrell v. ShuttleworthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Earl Earnest Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API