Lachmann v. Brookfield
New York Supreme Court
Action by one Rachmann against Kate M. Brookfield and another. On motion for the filing of a notice of appeal from a judgment directing the registration of plaintiff’s title to real property. Granted. Cowing, White & Wait, of New York City, for the motion. David Senft, of Brooklyn (Meyer Blumberg, of counsel), opposed.
1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.
From a judgment directing registration of plaintiff’s title defendant has appealed by notice filed with the county clerk and) served on plaintiff’s attorney. Nevertheless, as the title has been registered, defendant seeks to have her notice of appeal filed *262with the register as a cautionary notification to any possible transferee of the certificate.
The 1910 amendments to sections 393, 398, and 410 (Laws 1910, c. 627) of the Law for Registration of Titles tend to relieve the registrar from the custody and record of ordinary papers in the action, which are to be kept by the county clerk.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hawes v. United States Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- People ex rel. Realty Associates v. O'LoughlinNew York Supreme Court · 1912
- Hawes v. ClarkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913