Legal Opinion

Sternberg v. Botham, No. 61187 (Jul. 2, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 2, 1992No. 61187Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ISSUE

Whether the court should deny co-defendant Duane Totten's motion for summary judgment because the pleadings are not closed.

FACTS

The present action was originally instituted by the plaintiff, Michael J. Sternberg, as a small claims action. The small claims complaint alleged that defendants Betty Ann Botham and Duane Totten owe the plaintiff money for roofing and flooring services rendered by the plaintiff. Magistrate Ertman granted the defendants' motion to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Esposito v. WetheredConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  2. Griggs v. B & G Land, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API