Legal Opinion

Smith v. Champaign-Urbana City Lines, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 25, 1981No. Gen. 11,081PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraven, J.

This appeal from a judgment entered for defendant upon a directed verdict in a small-claims action before a magistrate, arising out of property damage to an automobile, raises two questions as to evidence. First, what evidence is required to raise the presumption that paid auto repair bills are reasonable and necessary expenses for repairs? Second, whether the formal rules of evidence apply to a suit filed as a small claim under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 282.

Plaintiff sued in a small-claims action for property damage to her automobile allegedly caused by the negligence of defendant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Byalos v. MathesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Schmidt v. SinclairAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. A.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Flynn v. CusentinoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Presto Manufacturing Co. v. Formetal Engineering Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Ross v. CortesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Sampson v. MiglinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API