Legal Opinion
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Shalala
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 18, 1999No. 96-55892PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
Underlying this appeal is a challenge by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and twenty-four other hospitals to a policy announced by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) in an amendment to its Medicare Manual. The new policy removed Medicare coverage of investigational medical devices and procedures that had not been approved for marketing by the Food and Drug Administration. The Hospitals claim the policy, now superceded by regulation, .was not originally issued in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq. Because the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sergeant Perry Watkins v. United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Wind River Mining Corporation v. United States of America Manuel Lujan, Jr. Delos Jacobson, Director of the Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Judy Lehman, Wife Mark Lehman, Husband v. United States of America, Judy Lehman, Wife Mark Lehman, Husband v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Victor Rivera v. Peri & Sons Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Rony Perez-Guzman v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Sai Kwan Wong Ex Rel. Wong v. DoarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- In re Cardiac Devices Qui Tam LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.