Legal Opinion

Robert Randall Co. v. City of Beaverton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 23, 1984No. 82-1880C; CA A28386PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This is a declaratory judgment proceeding in which plaintiffs seek to establish that defendant City of Beaverton’s water rate structure, as set out in Ordinance No. 3267, is arbitrary and unreasonable and, therefore, unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.1 The trial court held in favor of the city, and plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

Plaintiffs are owners of, or property managers for, apartments and apartment complexes located in the City of Beaverton. The city supplies plaintiffs’ businesses with domestic water. In 1979, the city’s voters authorized a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Goldstein v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Kliks v. Dalles CityOregon Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Building Owners & Managers Ass'n of Metropolitan Baltimore, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API