Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Steinberg
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1950No. 12814PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BORAK, Circuit Judge.
The question here is whether certain named fur trappers are employees of respondents within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. This question arises upon a petition of the Labor Board 1 *for enforcement of its order issued against respondents on July 14, 1948, following the usual proceedings in accordance with Section 10 of the Act. The Board, one member dissenting, found the trappers to be employees and further found that the employer interfered with, restrained, and coerced "its employees in violation of Section 8(a) (1) of the Act and discharged and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Casement v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- National Labor Relations Board v. Phoenix Mut. L. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Air Control Products of St. Petersburg, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cement Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. A. S. Abell Company and Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Checker Cab Company and Its MembersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.