Legal Opinion
Beaver v. Tarsadia Hotels
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 27, 2016No. CASE NO. 11CV1842-GPC(KSC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO PARTICIPATE IN DEFENSE OF THE MAIN ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 14(a)
HON. GONZALO P. CURIEL, United States District Judge
Before the Court is Third Party Defendant Greenberg Traurig LLP’s (“GP”) motion to participate in the defense of the main action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 14(a). Plaintiffs filed an opposition and GP filed a reply. (Dkt. Nos. 216, 217.) The Court finds the matter suitable for reso*348lution without oral argument pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dean Beaver v. Tarsadia HotelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Herbert Wiggins, Administrator of the Estate of James Wiggins v. City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- The F & D Property Co., a Corporation, and Fred M. Winner, Receiver v. James H. Alkire and Younker Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Lindner v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Garage Plus Storage Aviation LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- Pardy & Rodriguez, PA v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Parra v. ParraDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Romano v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021