Legal Opinion

State v. Ringler

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 29, 1989No. 88-307PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction of lewd and lascivious conduct with a male child who was seven years of age at the time of the alleged offense. 13 V.S.A. § 2602. During a trial by jury, the court excluded evidence that the child first reported the defendant’s abuse of him when the boy himself was under investigation for, and being questioned about, sexually abusing other children. Defendant claims this ruling violated his state and federal constitutional rights to confrontation and to present a defense. We decline to reach a constitutional challenge concerning the admission of prior…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RaymondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. R. E. Bean Construction Company, Inc. v. Middlebury Associates & Middlebury Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. State v. CongressSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. State v. HatcherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. State v. RussoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. In re D.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API