Legal Opinion

Hamilton County v. Aurora National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1911No. 16,609Published

Motion to vacate the judgment in this case reported in 88 Neb. 280.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

The appellee has filed a motion requesting the court to vacate the judgment of reversal, for the alleged reason that •Judge Sedgwick ivas not qualified to act as a judge in this case, and without his vote the judgment of the district court could not have been reversed.

Judges Rose and Sedgwick; did not hear the oral arguments, because Judge Rose, while deputy attorney general participated in an opinion to the state treasurer with respect to the subject matter of this litigation. Judge Sedgwick, before his electron, appeared as counsel for the county treasurer in the case of Hamilton County v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. RyanTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. McFaddin v. PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hamilton County v. CunninghamNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API