Cavender v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is murder; the punishment, life.
We are met at the outset with the question of whether it is permissible to submit to the jury, which has been impaneled to try the guilt of an accused, the question of his competency to stand trial when the question of competency is raised after the trial is in progress.
Three days and some 13 witnesses into the trial on the merits, the question of appellant’s competency to stand trial was raised. The court conducted a hearing and concluded that the issue of appellant’s competency existed. However, the court refused to impanel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Townsend v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Ainsworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Sisco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Cavender v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.