Legal Opinion

Backer v. City of Sidney

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1958No. 34268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

In reconsidering syllabus No. 3 in the original opinion, 165 Neb. 816, 87 N. W. 2d 610, we conclude that it should be withdrawn and in its place the following substituted: The most satisfactory distinction between general and special benefits is that general benefits are those which arise from the fulfillment of the public object which justified the taking, and special benefits are those which arise from the peculiar relation of the land in question to the public improvement. In other words the general benefits are those which result from the enjoyment of the facilities provided by the new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Backer v. City of SidneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ENTERPRISE COMPANY v. Sanitary District No. OneNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Morehead v. State Dept. of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Richardson v. Big Indian Creek Watershed Conservancy DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Phillips v. State, Department of Roads & IrrigationNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Richardson v. BIG INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED CON. DIST.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API