Bayer v. Becker
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HILDEBRANT, J.
Twenty-one jurors, comprising the list for the term, appeared in the Municipal Court of Cincinnati on May 18, 1944, in response to an order to do so to serve in this specified case alone.
An entry of dismissal at defendant’s costs was presented to the Clerk on May 17, 1944, who informed defendant’s attorney the fees of six jurors would be included as costs. The entry of dismissal was signed by the Judge on May 18, 1944, and no jurors were impanelled or sworn, nor was there any way to determine the individuals whose jury fees were taxed as part of the costs. Motion to…
2Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HarshmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. GalbreathOhio Court of Appeals · 2000