United States v. Olinger
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LUCAS, Judge:
This case raises an important issue regarding the legal effectiveness of an action by the Secretary of the Navy, through the Navy Clemency and Parole Board [hereinafter NCPB] to remit an approved punitive discharge and substitute therefor an administrative separation before a ease is reviewed by this court pursuant to Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866 (1994)[hereinafter UCMJ]. We hold that the action by the NCPB under these facts is final and binding on convening authorities and this court.
A review of the facts is necessary for a complete understanding…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. McGeeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. WalesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. OlingerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. DedertNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. GainesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. GoldenNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.