United States v. Arthur Young & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge:
This matter comes before the court on an order to show cause why respondent, Arthur Young & Company [hereinafter referred to as “Young”], should not be compelled to obey an Internal Revenue Service [hereinafter referred to as “IRS”] summons directing it to testify and to produce for examination certain documents pertaining to the tax liabilities of intervenor Amerada Hess Corporation [hereinafter referred to as “Amerada”] for tax years 1972, 1973 and 1974. The summons was issued pursuant to Section 7602 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 7602,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. BiscegliaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States of America and Ralph L. Guyette, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. John B. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Arthur Young & Company, and Amerada Hess Corporation, Intervenor-Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- In re International Systems & Controls Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
- Multistate Tax Commission v. Dow Chemical Co.Oregon Tax Court · 1982
- United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.