Commonwealth v. Kebort
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 351, Jan. T., 1904, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Ct., April T., 1905, No. 134, reversing order of Q. S. Crawford Co., Feb. T., 1904, No. 35, arresting judgment in case of Commonwealth v. F. J. Kebort and Nick Kebort. Appeal from the Superior Court. See. 26 Pa. Superior Ct. 584. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned ivas the judgment of the Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Chief Justice Mitchell,
The appellants, who are licensed liquor dealers, were in-*291dieted under the Act of June 26, 1895, P. L. 317, for selling a bottle of blackberry wine, which was adulterated within the meaning of the statute. The title of the act is “ an Act to provide against the adulteration of food, and providing for the enforcement thereof.” Section 2, enacts that “ the term ‘food’ as used herein shall include all articles used for food or drink by man whether simple, mixed or compound.” The first question before us is whether that section can be sustained as to drink,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Com. ex rel. Attorney General v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Commonwealth v. KevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
3Cited by22 opinions
- Nock v. Coca Cola Bot. Wks. Pgh.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Commonwealth v. DepofiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. FeinbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Cott Beverage Corp. v. HorstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Petroleum Lease Properties Co. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.