Legal Opinion

Denver Union Terminal Railway Co. v. Glodt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1919No. 9311PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. John A. Perry, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen:

This is an action brought by John J. Glodt and Albert Glodt, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs, against The Denver Union Terminal Railway Company, as defendant, to recover damages for the depreciation of the rental and market value of plaintiffs’ property, caused by the closing *116and vacation of parts of certain streets in the City and County of Denver, and the building of a viaduct approach.

The property of the plaintiffs, alleged to have been damaged, is described as lots 13 and 14, in block 5, of Hoyt & Robertson Addition to the City of Denver. This block…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Denver v. BayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. EberleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Vanderburgh v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. City of Pueblo v. StraitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  5. Highbarger v. MilfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Troiano v. Colorado Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. State Department of Highways, Division of Highways v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. LeSatz v. DeshotelsColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Majestic Heights Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  5. Mandell v. Board of Com'rs of Bernalillo CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API