Walbridge-Aldinger Co. v. Rudd
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SYMES, District Judge.
The appellant, plaintiff below, contracted with the city of Tulsa to excavate and lay a water conduit from what is known as Spavinaw Lake to Tulsá. The entire job was divided into 20-odd contracts, two of which, numbers 4 and 6, were awarded to appellant, and comprise the major portion of the project. The controversies that arose out of both contracts have been litigated in the same action. In the course of the work disputes arose between the city and the contractor, and, upon failure to adjust the same, the contractor abandoned the work and brought a suit in the United…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smith v. Vulcan Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Luminous Unit Co. v. Freeman-Sweet Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
- Chase v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Haley v. KilpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- (PC) Mekhtarian v. OrtegaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Landin v. Visalia Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Lantz Retirement Investments, LLC v. Brian GloverDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Lucy Mesa v. AIG Annuity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Pizana v. Sanmedica International LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019