Legal Opinion

Kaheana v. Nalimu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Judd, C.J.

After hearing counsel, we have examined the decision rendered by Mr. Justice McCully on the 10th of February last, and hereby affirm the same and adopt its reasoning.

Decision of McCully, J., Appealed From.

The verdict being for the plaintiff, the defendant’s counsel presents a motion for a new trial. The plaintiff’s counsel contends that the statute and the rule of Court in respect to motions for a new trial have not been complied with, in that no bond to the plaintiff has been filed, and that therefore the motion should not be entertained by the Court.

The…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. MagoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Stewart v. SpaldingHawaii Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Murray v. ColburnHawaii Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API