Legal Opinion
VAC Service Corp. v. Technology Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*525The allegations in the complaint arise from a dispute over a March 2003 services agreement entered into by the plaintiff and the defendants. Tucker Fartners, LF was not a party to that agreement and has no standing to enforce the terms of the agreement against the defendants (see DeRaffele v 210-220-230 Owners Corp., 33 AD3d 752, 753 [2006]; Sopasis Constr. v Solomon, 233 AD2d 385, 386-387 [1996]; Freidus v Sardelli, 192 AD2d 578, 580 [1993]). Moreover, the record demonstrated that Tucker Fartners, LP., was not a successor-in-interest to the plaintiffs rights under the services agreement (see…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Freidus v. SardelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Commercial Bank of Informatics & Computing Technique Development Bank Informtechnika v. OstashkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- NationsCredit Home Equity Services v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- DeRaffele v. 210-220-230 Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Sopasis Construction Inc. v. SolomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Board of Managers of 100 Congress Condominium v. SDS Congress, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Kaung v. Board of Managers of Biltmore Towers Condominium Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 2008
- JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. LevinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018