Legal Opinion
Worthy v. Cyberworks Technologies, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 29, 2002No. 1001636PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gerald Worthy and Merion Worthy appeal from the trial court's order granting a motion to dismiss filed by Cyberworks Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Cyberworks"), on the basis that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over Cyberworks. We affirm.
On October 4, 1999, the Worthys sued Soho Technologies, Inc. ("Soho"), Cyberworks, Cornerstone International ("Cornerstone"), and Nathaniel R. Kinsella, vice president of operations for Cornerstone, alleging fraud, violation of the "Alabama Telemarketing Act," § 8-19A-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975, and violation of Alabama's…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte Full Circle Distribution, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte LagroneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- South Alabama Skills Training Consortium v. FordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- Ex Parte Full Circle Distribution, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Lagrone v. Norco Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.