Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Harlan
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-appellants, Indiana & Michigan Electric Company (I & M) and Indiana Franklin Realty, Inc. (IFR), appeal a judgment, rendered by the Parke Circuit Court without a jury, ordering I & M and IFR to reconvey real estate acquired from plaintiff-appellee, Emma Harlan (Emma), by fraud, and assessing punitive damages.
We affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
In special findings of fact and conclusions of law requested by I & M and IFR, the trial court made the following findings, summarized by us. Emma and her husband, James, owned 60 acres of land in Prairie Creek…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dotlich v. DotlichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Walters v. DeanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- University Casework Systems, Inc. v. BahreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Grissom v. MoranIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Commonwealth Department of Agriculture v. VinsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Hubbard v. HubbardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Mehling v. Dubois County Farm Bureau Cooperative Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hart v. Steel Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- DeVittorio v. Werker Bros., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.