Legal Opinion

People v. Sanchez

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1984PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward C. Alfano, J.

The issues presented in both of these cases are whether the District Attorney is obligated to instruct the Grand Jury as to the requirement of corroboration, and what, if any, is the proper remedy for the failure to so instruct.

In both cases the court has dismissed the indictments on the ground that the People failed to instruct the Grand Jury as to the requirement of corroboration.

The District Attorney moves to reargue this court’s decision in each of these cases. The motion to reargue is granted. The following decision is substituted for this court’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. VallesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. KazmarickNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. . RandazzioNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. PerezNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. CoxNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. LlewelynNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API