Legal Opinion

Gross v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 12, 1998No. 97-3784PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal of his convictions and sentences for burglary while armed and grand theft, appellant asserts as error the trial court’s failure to conduct a Richardson1 hearing and the imposition of a sentence for grand theft exceeding the statutory maximum. We affirm as to the Richardson issue, *579but reverse for correction of the sentence for grand theft.

Appellant and three eodefendants were charged with the offenses of burglary and grand theft. Two days before appellant’s trial, the prosecutor noticed in one of the eodefendant’s files a sheet of paper revealing that one of the investigating…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. State v. SchoppSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Consalvo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  4. Pender v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  5. Allen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API